Showing posts with label Science & Anti-God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science & Anti-God. Show all posts

Thursday, 25 June 2015

Scientists Create First Entirely Lab-Grown Baby – The Soulless Humans

THEY CALL IT ONE OF THE HOLY GRAIL IN MEDICINE.....BUT WE CALL IT AN ABOMINATION

Scientists Create First Entirely Lab-Grown Baby – The Soulless Humans......By NotAllowedTo

lab baby
KOLTSOVO, RUSSIA – Scientists and researchers from Vector (State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology – Государственный научный центр вирусологии и биотехнологии Вектор), had successfully given life to the first human baby grown entirely in vitro and created from reprogrammed stem cells.
Frankenstein, Dr. Ivanov and his team after two years of research and experiments; gave life to an artificially created young boy in heir biotechnology lab, located in southern Russia.
Scientists have named the baby “ADAM” who was born on 15th of June 2015 in a laboratory of the research center. He weights only 400 grams and is barely seven inches (18 cm) tall, but the experts believe that his chances of survival are very good.
lab baby born
The tiny newborn is the size of a 22-week gestation baby and needs a ventilator and a feeding tube, but is otherwise “rather healthy”, say the scientists.
The project director and the famous genetician, Dr. Аlexei  Nicolaïevitch Ivanov said:
“The ability to create an entire human being from simple cells, in a lab, is definitely one of the ‘holy grails’ in medicine. This is a major breakthrough! For the first time, we literally created intelligent life from scratch!”
This is the new era of science, its the first time that scientists have literally given life to a human being, and the process is extremely complicated. The young boy had to be artificially assembled on a microscopic level, from various cells, which had previously been reprogrammed to become specific organs.
Scientists used specialised human cells derived from stem cells, which are called fibroblasts. These fibroblasts were turned into different cell strains, by flipping a genetic “switch” in their DNA, to create the various organs.
These “organ cells” were then assembled to create a living human embryo, and placed inside an artificial gestational sac, in a specially designed tank. This tank made to simulate amniotic fluids, contained mainly water with electrolytes, but also proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and phospholipids, and urea, to help him grow.
The embryo, then grew and developed for 36 weeks under the close supervision of a team of experts, until he reached full development.
russian lab
VECTOR Institute has been conducting a lot of controversial biotechnological experiments over the years, including many projects like cloning and biological warfare.
Dr. Ivanov explains :
“We created this tiny living being, and we watched him grow and develop, day after day. I have two kids myself, but this was totally different… Adam has no father or mother, he is entirely our creation. We created life from nothingness, and that makes me extremely proud. It was a wonderful experience.”
The announcement of Adam’s “birth” has brought Dr. Ivanonv and his team, dozens of violent critics. Many scientists, including Professor Clare Blackburn, from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Edinburgh,  denounced the unethical and immoral nature of the research project, claiming the actual scientific knowledge is insufficient to carry such experiment.
Professor Clare Blackburn said :
“We are hardly capable of creating viable organs, at the moment, so creating an entire being is just crazy. It still remains to be seen whether, in the long term, cells generated using direct reprogramming will be able to maintain their specialised form and avoid problems such as tumour formation. For all we know, this baby could gradually regress and become a sort of DNA ‘blob’…”

Thursday, 22 May 2014

WHY MUSLIMS' RADICALISM/VIOLENCE/EXTREMISM DIFFERS FROM ONE COUNTRY/PLACE TO ANOTHER




Thursday, May 22, 2014||ISLAM: What Everyone (Especially A Christian) Needs To Know. (13) DO U KNOW WHY SOME MUSLIMS ARE NON-VIOLENT, PARTIALLY VIOLENT & ABSOLUTELY VIOLENT DEPENDING ON PLACE/WHERE THEY FIND THEMSELVES? THE ANSWER IS CODED IN THE QURAN & DECODED IN THIS MESSAGE.

Islam is NOT a Religion of Peace/Submission to God and it CANNOT lead U To God. ONLY CHRIST CAN. MUSLIMS HAVE 3 TYPES OF JIHADS/VIOLENCE: 1. When they are in the Minority, 2. When their numbers are the same with that of Non Muslims & 3. When they are in the Majority).

JIHAD 1 (ACCOMMODATION): In Quran 109:1-7, Mohammed tells Muslims to Accommodate Non-Muslims. He said Muslims should serve Allah and allow Non-Muslims (whom he often called ''Disbelievers/Unbelievers/Pagan) to worship their God. NB: Thus, Muslims should ACCOMMODATE Non-Muslims and obey the Laws of the Country where they find themselves when they/Muslims are in the Minority. They/Muslims should practice their Islam and allow Non-Muslims to practice their faith/religion. This is the real Text:

''Say, ‘O ye disbelievers! ‘I worship not that which you worship; ‘Nor worship you what I worship.  ‘And I am not going to worship that which you worship; ‘Nor will you worship what I worship. For you your religion, and for me my religion.’

JIHAD 2 (DEFENSIVE): In Quran 22:39-40, Mohammed tells Muslims to be Defensive (Fight Back) when they are being attacked. NB: Thus, when Muslims population/number is equal to Non-Muslims in a country they find themselves, they should NOT ACCOMMODATE NON-MUSLIMS; THEY SHOULD DEFEND THEIR FAITH BECAUSE THEY ARE EQUAL TO THE NON-MUSLIMS IN TERMS OF NUMBERS/POPULATION. This is the real Text:

''Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory. [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, "Our Lord is Allah ." And were it not that Allah checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of Allah is much mentioned. And Allah will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and Exalted in Might.''

JIHAD 3 (OFFENSIVE): In Quran 9:29, Mohammed tells Muslims to Fight anybody (Non-Muslims) who do not accept Islam. NB: Thus, Mohammed tells Muslims that, wherever they OUTNUMBER Non-Muslims, they should fight till all Non Muslims accept Allah and the so-called last Messenger Mohammed. IT IS AT THIS STAGE THAT MUSLIMS APPLY SHARIA LAWS. In short, Mohammed tells Muslims to fight at all cost for EVERYONE TO ACCEPT ISLAM. This is the real Text:

''Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.''

NB:  jizyah IS a per capita tax levied on non-Muslims who live in Muslim/Islamic Country. So, Mohammed is telling Muslims to fight Non-Mulsims until they stop paying that tax and convert to Islam.

Now, check the progression: From ACCOMMODATING (when they/Muslims are in the Minority) to DEFENDING (When they/Muslims are equal to Non-Muslims at where they find themselves) THEN TO OFFENDING (When they/Muslims are in the Majority).

This is the reason why In some parts of the World, the Muslims are Not Violent. The reason is simple: They/Muslims are few in that country. This is Jihad 1

And where their/Muslim's population is equal to the Non-Muslims, then they/Muslims should fight back anytime they are attacked. This is Jihad 2

BUT When they are in the majority (i.e. when they/Muslims outnumber Non-Muslims), then they should make sure they fight & force all Non-Muslims to convert to Islam. This Jihad 3, when they implement SHARIA LAWS. Have U seen a full Islamic/Muslim Country where Christians are Not Persecuted by Muslims? Yet, Muslims find themselves in Full Christian Countries and are allowed to practice their faith without persecution. WHICH WAY IS PEACEFUL? CHRIST/CHRISTIANITY or MOHAMMED/ISLAM? CHOSE THE FORMER (i.e CHRIST) OVER THE LATTER (MOHAMMED).

~Samuel Kwasi Forkuo
ALL GLORY TO GOD

References
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=109

http://quran.com/22

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

SCIENCE & ANTI-GOD: Whole Foods Market whistleblower says employees were deliberately trained to lie about GMOs

Mike Adams
Natural News
Sept. 20, 2013

A new video from the group calling itself “Organic Spies” is once again rocking the organic food industry. In the video, a woman who identifies herself as a former employee of Whole Foods Market (WFM) testifies that she and other employees were deliberately trained by Whole Foods Market management to lie to store customers about whether the stores carry foods made with genetically engineered ingredients (GMOs).
According to this female whistleblower, whose identity is concealed for her protection, Whole Foods Market employees were deliberately instructed to lie to customers as part of their employee training. The denial of GMOs being sold in Whole Foods stores was an integral part of the training of employees, she explains:
When we first started, we had a “Day One and a Day Two, and they teach us about the core values of Whole Foods Market, the core values of nothing’s artificial, everything’s natural… When I first started at Whole Foods, I didn’t know what a GMO was. I had no idea what it was. They taught us what it was, and how Whole Foods Market did not carry GMOs.
So if a customer would have came up to me and said, do you guys have anything with GMOs? Does this product contain GMOs? [I would have said] absolutely not. Does not contain GMOs. Becausewe were taught that we don’t carry anything with GMOs, only natural, nothing artificial.
Click here to watch this whistleblower video, exclusively at TV.naturalnews.com, entitled Organic Spies – Whistleblowers expose Whole Foods Market organic fraud machine
Whistleblower confirmed as former Whole Foods employee
According to Organic Spies, Whole Foods Market deliberately taught employees to lie to customers about GMOs for a five-year period, spanning 2007 – 2011.
The Organic Spies group claims to have evidence of this from multiple Whole Foods Market stores in several major cities across the United States.
Organic Spies further claims that Whole Foods top executives were fully aware that low-level employees were being deliberately trained to lie to customers about GMOs. This claim is denied by Whole Foods Market (see below).
As part of the due diligence conducted by Natural News, I personally saw documents that appear to confirm this whistleblower was a former employee of Whole Foods. I also spoke with her by phone and was able to confirm that she speaks with what appears to be specialized knowledge that would not normally be known by someone who had not been an actual employee of Whole Foods.

Here’s an image from the video, depicting this whistleblower:

SCIENCE & ANTI-GOD: Failed Monsanto GMO Corn Pushed on African Countries with Help of Bill Gates

Elizabeth Renter
Infowars.com
November 17, 2013
Even if you aren’t opposed to genetically modified crops (with all this information, how couldn’t you be) and even if you like Bill Gates and his ventures (but with all this information, how could you), this latest should be enough to get you perturbed. And if you are anti-GMO and knowledgeable of the shady and questionable ways of the Gates Foundation, this latest story out of Africa will truly make your blood boil.

According to a recent statement from the African Centre for Biosafety (ACB), failed GM corn from Monsanto is now being pushed on African countries with help from the Gates Foundation. This maize, known as MON810, has been grown in South Africa for 15 years, where it “failed miserably”. But so as not to call the seed a complete waste, Monsanto and Bill Gates are now pushing it into countries like Mozambique, Uganda, Tanzania, and Kenya—countries that need agricultural help.
Monsanto got the science completely wrong on this one. Independent biosafety scientists have discovered that the inheritance of resistance in African stem borers is a dominant, not recessive, trait as erroneously assumed,” explained the Director of the ACB Miriam Mayet. “Hence the insect resistance management strategies that Monsanto developed, and accepted by our regulators, based on these erroneous assumptions, were utterly ineffective.”
What this means, simply, is that pests in South Africa developed a massive resistance to the chemicals in the corn, annihilating the one prominent argument for GM crops, that it is resistant to insects. The corn was such a disaster that Monsanto willingly compensated farmers for the pesticides they had to spray on their crops to further fight the insects. Compensation from Monsanto? Weird.
Now, to not waste the waste of a seed, Monsanto has donated the MON810 technology to a “philanthropic” venture of the Gates Foundation and Monsanto called Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA), and they’ve done it royalty-free.
For small African farmers with few resources, WEMA was seen as a positive thing, providing seeds that could withstand harsh conditions. But now, drought-tolerant varieties aren’t the only seeds being pushed onto the continent.
Kenya and Uganda have already begun field trials on MON810. Mozambique is changing their biosafety laws to allow the GM crop and WEMA is putting pressure on Tanzania to do the same. Currently, Tanzanian biosafety laws allow Monsanto to be held “strictly liable” for damages that could arise from the use of MON810; WEMA is understandably opposed to this. After all, they know the dangers associated with their crops even if they don’t want to admit it.
Interestingly, and frighteningly, MON810 has been genetically altered into a variety of Egyptian corn known as “Ajeeb Yieldgard” which has already been patented by Monsanto and approved for commercial growing while circumventing Egyptian biosafety laws. The Egyptian government itself has published peer reviewed studies indicating the risk of MON810 to human and animal health.
Put best by ACB researcher Haidee Swanby, “The scariest revelation is that GM producers and regulatory authorities are making it all up as they go along, while the massive biotech PR machinery spreads the myth that these crops are connected to feeding the poor in Africa.”
Originally appeared at Natural Society.
This article was posted: Sunday, November 17, 2013 at 6:01 am
Tags: 

SCIENCE & ANTI-GOD: 297 scientists, experts sign statement: GMOs not proven safe

Jon Rappoport
Infowars.com
February 6, 2014

The statement was drawn up by the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility. It was released on October 21, 2013. Since then, 297 scientists and experts have signed it.
Thus exploding the myth that “the science is settled.”
Exploding the claim that a consensus about GMOs has been reached.
You can read the statement and the signatories at ensser.org.
Here are two excerpts from the statement:
“As scientists, physicians, academics, and experts from disciplines relevant to the scientific, legal, social and safety assessment aspects of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we strongly reject claims by GM seed developers and some scientists, commentators, and journalists that there is a ‘scientific consensus’ on GMO safety and that the debate on this topic is ‘over’.”
“We feel compelled to issue this statement because the claimed consensus on GMO safety does not exist. The claim that it does exist is misleading and misrepresents the currently available scientific evidence and the broad diversity of opinion among scientists on this issue. Moreover, the claim encourages a climate of complacency that could lead to a lack of regulatory and scientific rigour and appropriate caution, potentially endangering the health of humans, animals, and the environment.”
The number of scientists on either side of a question does not, alone, imply a final answer. But it does indicate whether the question is closed or still open. It does indicate that those who claim the question is closed are wrong.
Completely wrong.
Monsanto PR and government PR and media PR are so many tongues wagging in the wind.
In previous articles, I’ve highlighted dangers and lies re GMOs. Here I’m simply reporting that a consensus about GMO safety is a delusion.
In other words, anybody can say “everybody knows…” And if those people have access to, or control, major media, they can make a persuasive case.
But the persuasion is nothing more than one voice drowning out other voices.
Other voices who, for example, make this declaration:
(Signatory, Dr. Margarida Silva, biologist and professor at the Portugese Catholic University)—“…research has been mostly financed by the very companies that depend on positive outcomes for their business, and we now know that where money flows, influence grows. The few independent academics left must work double shift to address the vast array of unanswered questions and red flags that keep piling up.”
Or this voice: Signatory, Dr. Raul Montenegro, biologist, University of Cordoba, Argentina—“As things stand, the governments of these countries [Argentina, Brazil] deny that there is a [GMO] problem even in the face of numerous reports from the people who are affected and the doctors who must treat them.”
So far, there are 297 such voices.
Will CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX report this story in full and overturn the false consensus? Will they make room for the 297 voices?
Of course not. Their job is to invent consensus by consulting “reliable sources.” Meaning: liars who also want to invent false consensus.
This post originally appeared at www.nomorefakenews.com
This article was posted: Thursday, February 6, 2014 at 5:36 am

SCIENCE & ANTI-GOD: Biotech is Creating GMO Human Babies: What could possibly go wrong?

Christina SarichPrison Planet.com
March 4, 2014
With the human race slowly being killed off by GMO food, environmental poisons, petroleum, plastics, chemtrails, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations, radiation, and weaponized warfare, the powers that be are working on new strain of stronger ‘humans’ to carry on our existence. Forget designer babies with specific gene preferences determined by parents, we’re talking about the utter transformation by a technocracy of the human genome.
It is called transhumanism and scientists in the UK and US have already submitted proposals to legally create GMO babies. Actually, GMO human embryos have already been created.
Techno-eugenics, you might call it – a way to appropriate humanity for the use of an elite class. It seems innocuous at first – using stem cells to help women with fertility issues get pregnant or to help develop a healthy fetus in a woman who has damaged DNA, but it isn’t something to be taken lightly, or without deep moral concern.
The same energy that created the atom bomb could have been used for less malevolent purposes, and this is no different. Sure, a bionic arm for a Vietnam vet who has lost his due to an IED explosion is a good thing  - but ‘improving’ upon the human form until we look more like Iron Man than a human being? What is the good in that? For some, it is considered our destiny.
To understand transhumanism, you have to understand the philosophical leanings of some of its earliest members. Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous who authored Brave New World, first used this word: Transhumanism. Huxley was a member of the British Eugenics Society, eugenics being the touchstone of this movement.
Members of the FDA say they are worried that not enough testing had been done on animals or in vivo to start creating GMO babies, and Dr. Evan Snyder of the Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif., who chairs the 25-member committee which will determine if this is the right direction for humanity to go in, said:
I think there was a sense of the committee that at this particular point in time, there was probably not enough data either in animals or in vitro to conclusively move on to human trials … without answering a few additional questions.”
few additional questions? How about a slew of them, like:
1. Who will determine which genes are to be vetted out and disposed of and which genes will be kept? Who is to prevent this from becoming a highly technologically advanced version of Stalinism or Nazism?
2. Will some races be considered inferior to others, and will designer babies only be available to certain groups of people? We already know that the elite class wants to perpetuate their own bloodlines, and weed out the ‘disposable’ class, as Bill Gates has been known to call us.
The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.” ~ Bill Gates
3. Will people be conditioned to accept their ‘enhanced’ state like we are being asked to accept drones and other ‘bionic’ warfare? What happens if we don’t want to be ‘enhanced’ or modified at all?
4. If government agencies and corporations create our new DNA, who has ownership to our bodies? It is already well known that DNA banks exist wherein corporations have been allowed to patent specific genes – including those which cause disease – so that they can ‘offer’ the ‘cure’ for reducing the diseases they cause. In a 105-page decision, two federal judges have allowed corporations to own genes again.
5. Is the act of creating humans morally acceptable in any way, shape, or form?
Companies like Myriad Genetics are already fighting over ownership of that which is ‘natural’ and that which is genetically modified or man-made DNA:
“According to Myriad, isolated DNA does not exist in nature, and isolated DNAs, unlike native DNAs, can be used as primers and probes for diagnosing cancer.”
At TechDirt.com, Mike Masnick made the colorful analogy that this is like “arguing that because a severed finger is not attached to a hand, the finger is not naturally occurring, and, thus, is patentable.”
If you want Big Pharma and Biotech companies to be able to own every square inch of you – right down to your DNA – then this is a great advance in technology and medicine. The babies you make will not be your own, and the DNA in your own body will be patented by some corporation that has the same rights as a person. This isn’t a Brave New World, it’s a completely insane one.
Additional Sources:
This post originally appeared at Natural Society
This article was posted: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 5:14 am
Tags: