DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM Message 4: OTHER PRACTICES

Topic Two: DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM
Message 4: OTHER PRACTICES (Pope's Infallibility, Mary's Perpetual Virginity, Infant Baptism and Sprinkling, Celibacy of Catholic Priests, Sainthood/Priesthood, Rosary etc) 
  By: Samuel Kwasi Forkuo (Admin, Warning: Church, Get Prepared - WCGP)



1. Pope's Infallibility: It is called the doctrine of Papal Infallibility. In brief, it teaches that when the Pope, speaking in his official capacity as the successor to St. Peter (ex cathedra, or from his throne), he cannot be in error; his pronouncements on matters of doctrine and morals are infallible and are binding upon all Roman Catholics, and they are commanded to accept the decrees of the Pope without questioning.

The Pope, it is taught by this doctrine, is as much infallibly inspired in his teaching as the writers of the Scriptures. Previous to the adoption of the doctrine of Infallibility, the church councils added all the innumerable traditions to the Bible, but since the Pope was declared to be the infallible interpreter of the Scriptures and the final authority on doctrine and morals, the Church must now accept whatever new doctrine or "revelation" the Pope as head of the church imposes upon them.

The strange thing about this Papal infallibility is the fact that it was not accepted until in the latter half of the l9th century. During the reign of Pope Pius IX, a Vatican council convened to discuss the subject of Papal infallibility, which had been brewing for some time.

In 1869, less than 100 years ago (and 1800 years after God closed the canon of Scripture - Revelation 22:18), Pope Pius IX called this Council in which the issue was to be debated. Strong opposition was raised by certain prominent bishops, who pointed out the history of errors by past popes. Among those most strongly opposed to this new dogma was Bishop Stossmayer, who traced the history of past Popes, and pointed out how the decrees of past infallible (!) Popes had been rescinded, reversed or set aside by other Popes. The Bishop pointed out the dark and sordid history of murder, incest, adultery and avarice associated with past popes.

In spite of the violent protests of a segment of the council, however, the Vatican Council enacted into dogma the doctrine of Papal Infallibility in July, 1870. Of course, this action raises a lot of questions. How is it that this doctrine was not revealed or adopted till 1800 years after Peter, their so-called first Pope, admitted that he could not even understand some things in the Scriptures written by Paul (II Peter 3:16)?

Was Pope Pius IX the first Pope who was infallible? Were the Popes before him also infallible? How then could they disagree, and one Pope set aside what another Pope had declared as an infallible revelation? How is it that the Assumption of Mary was never revealed until the 20th century? - but then, no one is supposed to ask such questions about an "infallible" Pope. The faithful Roman Catholic is not to ask questions at all: he is obliged to accept what his Church teaches.

2. Mary's Perpetual Virginity: Roman Catholics are taught the virgin Mary never had sex after Jesus was born and that Jesus had no brothers and sisters. The Pope teaches that Mary is the mediator between God and man. Meanwhile, Bible explicitly states that Mary gave birth after Jesus. And as we know only Christ's birth was without Joseph meeting Mary. This means that Mary was not a virgin forever.  "Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not His mother called Mary, and His brothers, James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? "And His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this man get all these things?" Matthew 13:55-56. Aha, Catholics are quick to say that these were half-siblings of Christ. REALLY? If they were half-siblings, the Bible would have said so. 


3. Infant Baptism and Sprinkling: The Catholic church baptizes babies by sprinkling a little water on them. Greek work for baptism literally means immersion. There are separate words in Greek for sprinkling, pouring and immersion. Only the Greek word for immersion is ever used for Baptism in the Bible. The first recorded case of sprinkling was in 257 AD to someone on a sick-bed. It was then an exception to the rule and brought about fierce opposition from the whole church. Not until 757 AD did the church accept sprinkling in such sick-bed cases of necessity. It wasn't until 1311 AD, when the Catholic council of Ravenna, declared that sprinkling was and acceptable substitute for immersion and from that time forward sprinkling replaced immersion in the Roman Catholic church. The Orthodox church refused sprinkling and still immerses to this day. Jesus was baptised by immersion..."After being baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and lighting on Him" Matthew 3:16. The apostles baptised by immersion.  "And he ordered the chariot to stop; and they both went down into the water, Philip as well as the eunuch, and he baptized him. When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away." Acts 8:38-39. Babies must not be baptised until they reach age of responsibility, where they can make decisions; know right from wrong and personally can decide to accept Christ Jesus as their Lord and Saviour. Babies can be dedicated to God, as was done to Christ. When they are of age, they can be baptised.


4. Celibacy of Catholic Priests: Most Catholics believe that Apostle Peter was the first Pope and was not married. As one Roman Catholic leader said, "if Peter had a wife when he first met Jesus, he got rid of her quick!" "Now Simon's mother-in-law was lying sick with a fever; and immediately they spoke to Jesus about her." Mark 1:30 "Do we not have a right to take along a believing wife, even as the rest of the apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?" 1 Corinthians 9:5 

In 1079 AD celibacy was first enforced for priests and bishops by Pope Gregory VII. Before this time, they were permitted to marry. "A bishop, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable, free from the love of money. He must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity (but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?)" 1 Timothy 3:2-5. Yet the bishop of Rome (the Pope) and his cohorts are under obligation not to marry. 

"But the Holy Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth." 1 Timothy 4:1-3

The truth is, if an individual Decides not marry, that's ok, just as Paul did. But to make it mandatory that anybody who wants to be a priest/bishop must not marry is in sharp contrast with the Word of God.

5. Sainthood/Priesthood: The Pope decided to reserve the title of "priest" to worn by church leaders only. The average pew dwelling Catholic never refer to themselves as "priests". In fact if a lay Catholic started calling himself a "priest", he would be rebuked by "the parish Priest"! "you (all Christians) also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. " 1 Peter 2:5
"But you (all Christians) are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; " 1 Peter 2:9
"Jesus has made us (all Christians) to be a kingdom, priests to His God and Father—to Him be the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen." Revelation 1:6
"You have made them (all Christians) to be a kingdom and priests to our God; and they will reign upon the earth." Revelation 5:10. And for this reason, any person truly born of God with His name written in the Lamb's Book of Life is considered a Saint by God. We don' need to be a member of the Catholic Church, die and be ushered into sainthood by a Roman priest/pope. It is only God who grants Sainthood and he calls those He has saved and will reign with them Saints.


6. Rosary: The Catholics teach that the rosary should be performed every day.  I'd like to have ANYONE show me that from the Bible.  Where did God tell us to perform a rosary?  The Rosary, or prayer beads, was introduced by Peter the Hermit, in the year 1090...copied from Hindus and Mohammedans.  The counting of prayers is a pagan practice and is expressly condemned by Christ (Matthew 6:5-13).  The rosary should NEVER be performed by anyone, it is sinful.  Jesus condemned chants and recited prayers..."But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking." —Matthew 6:7. Rosary Beads graphically represent how Roman Catholics heap 10 times more praise upon Mary than God himself. Of the 59 total beads of the Rosary, 53 beads are "Hail Marys", but only 6 beads are "Our Father". The Rosary most often ends with a "Hail, Holy Queen" prayer to Mary, not God.


These and many more are the unbiblical practices/teachings/doctrines/traditions of the Roman Catholic Church. And since we've been made aware of these things, Christ's door is always opened. His arms are always opened to receive us...THE CHOICE IS OURS NOW. WE CAN CHOOSE TO RUN TO OR FROM HIM....BUT THE CONSEQUENCE IS ETERNAL. MAY HE GRANT US THE GRACE TO RUN TO HIM BY OBEYING THIS CLARION CALL. AMEN

ALL GLORY TO GOD.

DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM Message 3: Mary/Fatima, Idols, Dead-Catholics, Statue worship

Topic Two: DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM
Message 3: Mary/Fatima, Idols, Dead-Catholics, Statue worship
By: Samuel Kwasi Forkuo (Admin, Warning: Church, Get Prepared - WCGP)

"You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth. You shall not worship them or serve them." Exodus 20:4-5


Catholics regularly bow down to idols, icons and images of Jesus, Mary and the apostles, kissing the feet of the statues and praying to them. Now Catholics get very upset when you tell them of worshipping Mary. They deny they are worshipping Mary, vehemently. What they need to understand, is that the Bible teaches that WE ONLY PRAY TO DEITY and Christians considers it paganism and polytheism to pray to anyone EXCEPT the Father, Son or Holy Spirit. So while Catholics pray to Mary, they fail to comprehend that only deity is to be prayed to, and this is the underlying reason why non-Catholics correctly lay the fact that they (Catholics) worship Mary AND ALL THE SAINT, they pray to. The Bible clearly teaches that all dead humans, though conscious in the spirit world, are unable to know anything, much less hear prayers addressed to them. Bowing down to icons and kissing them etc. so closely resemble idol worship it is actually shocking that any Roman Catholic would attempt to defend the practice. But again, they simply do the practice but deny it is worship. To illustrate the point, Muslim deny they are worshipping the moon god as their "Allah" as moon worship is even condemned in the Koran. But the fact of history is that Muhammad rid the Kaaba in Mecca of the 365 gods inside the cubical building, but retained the one on the roof known as the moon god "Hubal". Muhammad simply took the moon god from the roof, denied it was the moon god and called Hubal "Allah". The historical vestage of this origin is confirmed in that every mosque in the world has a crescent moon on the roof… just like the original Hubal moon god on the roof of the Kaaba. Muslims get mad when you point out that Allah is really the moon god and Catholics get mad when you point out they are worshipping the Mary and the saints when they pray to them. When a child stands in the middle of a room and puts his hand over his eyes and says, "you can't see me", that doesn't mean they are invisible, except in the mind of the child. Roman Catholics put their hands over their eyes and say, "We do no worship idols and we do not consider praying to Mary and act of worship". Saying so doesn't make it so. Roman Catholic apologists who harshly criticize protestants who tell them of worshipping idols and Mary need to take a close look in the mirror and be honest with reality. At the very least, they could tone down their ranting against protestants "misrepresenting Catholic faith" with a bit of self-reflection and a good history lesson.

The Pope deleted the 2nd of the 10 commandments so they could use statues & images in worship. They split the 10th commandment on coveting into two commandments so they could still have 10 in number. Don't believe this? Look at the list of 10 commandments published by the Roman Catholic church! The issue here is not how the Ten Commandments are numbered, rather the issue is that most published lists of the 10 commandments do not include the words, "you shall not for yourself an idol". Open your Catholic Bible and look for yourself!

And have you ever asked yourself why Muslims & Catholics have a lot of things in common? The simple answer is, Vatican, the headquarters of Roman Catholic, created Islam. Mohammed's wife, Khadija and her cousin Waraqqa, who wrote the Quran as Mohammed dictated, were both Ex-Catholics. So a lot of beliefs in Islam were actually copy-cut from Catholic/Catholicism. And Vatican created Islam for one purpose, so that Muslims will conquer Jerusalem from the Jews and hand it over to the bishop of Roman, the Pope, for it to be the headquarters of Roman Catholics. To read more on this, please see our articles here: http://warningchurchgetprepared.blogspot.com/2014/03/ge.html

Now, getting back to the topic under discussion, let's consider how scripture frowns on idolatry

Lev. 26:1, "You shall not make for yourselves idols, nor shall you set up for yourselves an image or a sacred pillar, nor shall you place a figured stone in your land to bow down to it; for I am the Lord your God."  See Joshua 23:7

2 Chron. 33:6-7, He did much evil in the sight of the Lord, provoking Him to anger. 7 Then he put the carved image of the idol which he had made in the house of God, of which God had said to David and to Solomon his son, “In this house and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen from all the tribes of Israel, I will put My name forever;

Ezek. 14:3, "Son of man, these men have set up their idols in their hearts, and have put right before their faces the stumbling block of their iniquity. Should I be consulted by them at all?"

Deut. 4:15, "So watch yourselves carefully, since you did not see any form on the day the Lord spoke to you at Horeb from the midst of the fire, 16 lest you act corruptly and make a graven image for yourselves in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female,"

Isaiah 44:17, But the rest of it he makes into a god, his graven image. He falls down before it and worships; he also prays to it and says, “Deliver me, for you are my god."  See also Isaiah 45:20, “Gather yourselves and come; Draw near together, you fugitives of the nations; They have no knowledge, Who carry about their wooden idol, and pray to a god who cannot save.

Deut. 4:19, "And beware, lest you lift up your eyes to heaven and see the sun and the moon and the stars, all the host of heaven, and be drawn away and worship them and serve them, those which the Lord your God has allotted to all the peoples under the whole heaven." 

Ex. 20:4-5, "You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth. 5 “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God . . . "

Acts 10:24-26, "And on the following day he entered Caesarea. Now Cornelius was waiting for them, and had called together his relatives and close friends. 25 And when it came about that Peter entered, Cornelius met him, and fell at his feet and worshiped him. 26 But Peter raised him up, saying, “Stand up; I too am just a man."   

Rev. 22:8-9, "And I, John, am the one who heard and saw these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship at the feet of the angel who showed me these things. 9 And he said to me, “Do not do that; I am a fellow servant of yours and of your brethren the prophets and of those who heed the words of this book; worship God."

Does the Roman Catholic Church promote idolatry?  According to the scripture and its own practices, yes it does. Now, get this: Anything we value equal to, or more than, God, is actually an idol. If we value food, football/sports, money, a celebrity, pastor, priest, prophet --- You name it--- that person/thing becomes an idol. When someone says someone is his idol, don't underestimate that phrase; the person means it - he loves the person so much so that he has idolized him in his heart. And if someone will not have time for, or fellowship with, God because of his business, it should tell you what/who he pledges his allegiance to. Many people focus on adultery but forget that idolatry is also dangerous. If it is not dangerous, Paul would not have said; "Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry." (1 Cor. 10:14).

May God grant us the grace to head to this clarion call. Amen

DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM: Message 2: Observance of Days, Months, Years etc (Eg., Christmas, Easter, Valentine, Lent, Halloween)

Topic Two: DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM
Message2 : Observance of Days, Months, Years, etc (Eg., Christmas, Easter, Lent, Valentine, Halloween,ETC)
By: Samuel Kwasi Forkuo (Admin, Warning: Church, Get Prepared - WCGP)


Paul, the Apostle of Christ, wrote this to the Christians in Galatia, ''You observe days and months and seasons and years. I fear for you, that perhaps I have labored over you in vain." Galatians 4:10-11

The Roman Catholic church has invented an entire yearly calendar of non Biblical holy Days like Christmas, Easter, Valentine, Lent, St. Patrick, etc.  No one prior to 335 AD celebrated the birthday of Jesus. The word "Christmas" (Christ + Mass) was first used in 1038 AD. Before 335 AD, the pagan cult of Mithra, the Iranian "god of light", had long celebrated December 25 as Mithra's birthday. December 21, being the winter solace, marked the beginning of days with increasing amount of light, hence December 25 celebrated Mithra's triumph over darkness. Because the pagan festival that celebrated Mithra's birthday was so popular, the Roman Catholic church adopted the day, but changed the meaning from the birthday of Mithra, the "god of light", to Christ's birthday, God the son, "light of the world". The old meaning of December 25 was connected with Mithra's triumph over physical darkness. The new meaning celebrated Jesus triumph over spiritual darkness. Eventually Christmas became dominant, the Mithra cult went extinct and today this origin is not widely known among Roman Catholics. None of the apostles or the early church celebrated the birthday of Jesus.

This is what preacher Charles H. Spurgeon had to say, ''We have no superstitious regard for times and seasons. Certainly we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Christmas. First, because we do not believe in any mass at all, but abhor it whether it be sung in Latin or in English. Secondly, because we find no Scriptural warrant whatever for observing any day as the birthday of the Saviour; and consequently, it's observance is a superstition, because not of divine authority. Superstition has fixed most positively the day of our Saviour's birth, although there is no possibility of discovering when it occurred. It was not till the middle of the third century that any part of the Church celebrated the birth of our Lord; and it was not till long after the western Church had set the example, that the eastern adopted it. Because the day is not known, probably the fact is that the "holy" days were arranged to fit in with the heathen festivals. We venture to assert that if there be any day in the year of which we may be pretty sure that it was not the day on which our Saviour was born, it is the 25th of December. Regarding not the day, let us give God thanks for the gift of His dear Son. How absurd to think we could do it in the spirit of the world, with a Jack Frost clown, a deceptive worldly Santa Claus, and a mixed program of sacred truth with fun, deception and fiction. If it be possible to honor Christ in the giving of gifts, I cannot see how while the gift, giver, and recipient are all in the spirit of the world. The Catholics and high Church Episcopalians may have their Christmas one day in 365, but we have a Christ gift the entire year." (Dec. 24, 1871) "Upright men strove to stem the tide, but in spite of all their efforts, the apostasy went on, till the Church, with the exception of a small remnant, was submerged under pagan superstition. that Christmas is a pagan festival, is beyond all doubt. The time of the year, and the ceremonies with which it is celebrated, prove its origin." "Those who follow the custom of observing Christmas, follow not the Bible but pagan ceremonies."


NO-WHERE in the Bible can you find that Christ commanded His Disciples to remember Him through His Birthday. And NOWHERE in the Bible can you find that the followers of Christ (the Apostles of the early Church) celebrated the Birth of Christ.

The argument that Celebrators of Days/Months/Years (especially Christmas Celebrators/Lovers) put forward o support their stance is; ''What is wrong to choose one day to remember Lord Jesus Christ?' Well, they have a seemingly valid question and a valid point, as it were. But the point is, DO YOU CHOOSE HOW TO WORSHIP GOD OR GOD HAS A LAID DOWN PROCEDURE? DO U CHOOSE HOW TO REMEMBER CHRIST OR YOU FOLLOW WHAT CHRIST HIMSELF HAS ALREADY LAID DOWN?

Christ Himself gave the Disciples, who became Apostles, and any would-be follower, WHAT MUST BE USED IN REMEMBRANCE OF HIM. That is, He clearly stated and actually partook in WHAT WAS TO BE USED TO REMEMBER HIM....AND TO THE SHOCK OF LOVERS OF PLEASURE, IT WAS NOT CHRISTMAS, EASTER, LENT, VALENTINE, ST. PATRICK'S, OR HALLOWEEN. IT WAS NOT ANY OF THESE....IT WAS THE LAST/LORD'S SUPPER.

''And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying,“This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you'' Luke 22:19-20

Indeed, Christ Himself instituted this as the MEANS THROUGH WHICH WE COULD AND WOULD REMEMBER HIM. And because Christ passed it on unto His followers, He commanded them to also teach others to obey everything that He (Christ) has taught them (Matthew 28:20). Now, listen to what Paul, who was a sinner but later became converted and an Apostle of Christ, had to say;

''For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.''' 1 Corinthians 11:23-26

Clearly, Christ Himself Instituted THE LORD'S SUPPER, which, when observed, is a proclamation of the Lord's Death till He Comes. NOWHERE IN THE BIBLE DID CHRIST OR THE APOSTLES OBSERVE CHRISTMAS OR EASTER TO REMEMBER CHRIST'S BIRTH OR DEATH. Yet you will see so many 'Men of God' quoting scriptures anyhow to support their already flawed stance. As for Lent, Halloween and others such as Valentine's & St. Patrick's Days, the least said about the, the better. 

In conclusion, the question I would like to put across for you to ponder on it is this: Which group has Biblical backing when it comes to Christmas and Easter? Is it the people who believe that we SHOULD NOT CELEBRATE or the people who say WE SHOULD? If you are honest, you will know that it is definitely those who say we SHOULDN'T because they can prove from the Bible that 1. Christ didn't celebrate His Birthday 2. Christ Didnt tell His Disciples to remember His birthday 3. NOWHERE did the Disciples/Apostles/Early Church celebrate Christmas or Easter. Christ knew that it is the Lord's Supper that can be adequate/enough to be used remember Him because it talks about the PENALTY HE PAID FOR US ON THE CROSS - THAT SACRIFICE WHICH SUPERSEDES ALL SACRIFICES. And since we don't take the Lord's Supper anyhow (for anyone who wants to take part in it must examine himself first), it helps us to be mind of the way we live. Thus, since we cannot take part in the Lord's Supper if we are practicing sin, we are mindful of our lifestyles; unlike Christmas which is enjoyed by both Christians and Non-Christians, with all vices being done most on that day. DON'T TAKE PART IN CHRISTMAS OR EASTER JUST BECAUSE MANY CHRISTIANS CELEBRATE IT. THEY COULD BE WRONG. AND BIBLE AND/OR HISTORY HAS TAUGHT US THAT IN MOST CASES, MAJORITY ARE WRONG. It took me sometime before coming to terms with this Truth. Though I knew Christmas and Easter were not in the Bible, I loved the celebration so much so that I found it difficult to part ways with them. Thanks be to God that He granted be the grace to wean myself from these and many traditions of men which only have Christ' name attached to them - but in reality, they are not of Christ. It is my prayer He helps you to come to same truth, too. 

If you think NOT CELEBRATING CHRISTMAS or EASTER is anti-God, then you better call Peter, Paul and all the Apostles and Early Church as Anti-God because non of them celebrated Christmas or Easter. May God help us to celebrate Christ and show our love to God and humanity with our lives everyday-- not only on 25th December whilst living the rest of the days in the year cheating people and indulging in all kinds of sin as if we don't know Christ.

NB: U can read further on Christmas & the Lord's Supper from http://warningchurchgetprepared.blogspot.com/2014/03/what-christ-commanded-disciples-to-use.html

ALL GLORY TO GOD.

DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM: Message 1: The Plain Truth about the Roman Catholic Church

Topic Two: DANGERS OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM
Message 1: The Plain Truth about the Roman Catholic Church
By: Samuel Kwasi Forkuo (Admin, Warning: Church, Get Prepared - WCGP)

Ask any Catholic of the origin of the Church and he will refer you to to Matthew 16:18. In that verse, Jesus said ''And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.'' Jesus, when making that Matthew 16:18 declaration, WAS NOT REFERRING TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH; MUCH LESS MAKING PETER THE FIRST POPE. The Roman Catholic Church claims to have started in Matthew 16:18 when Christ supposedly appointed Peter as the first Pope. They say "Outside the Church there is no salvation" (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus) Catholic Dictionary/Encyclopedia. However, the honest and objective student of Scriptures and history soon discovers that the foundation of the Roman church is none other than the pagan mystery religion of ancient Babylon. 

THE CHURCH JESUS CHRIST WAS TALKING ABOUT WAS NOT EVEN BAPTIST, DEEPER LIFE, APOSTOLIC, PRESBYTERIAN, SALVATION ARMY, OR PENTECOST --- MUCH LESS ROMAN CATHOLIC, JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, LATTER-DAY SAINTS OR SDA. 

THE CHURCH THAT HE WOULD BUILD WAS A PEOPLE (NOT A PLACE OF WORSHIP) WHO, THROUGH GENUINE REPENTANCE, WOULD HAVE THEIR SINS WASHED IN CHRIST'S BLOOD AND HAVE THEIR NAMES WRITTEN IN THE LAMB'S BOOK OF LIFE. THAT IS, CHRIST WAS TALKING OF THOSE THAT HE WOULD FORGIVE, ACCEPT, REDEEM/SAVE AND CALL THEM HIS OWN. IN FACT, SUCH A PEOPLE IS OFTEN REFERRED TO AS ''THE BRIDE OF CHRIST.'' The Church, by Christ's definition, is not a religious denomination with the largest number or first to be known (for the Catholics to think that they are); is not a place of worship (for the Latter-Day Saints to think that they are, because they think they have ultra-modern worship centers); and is not about tract-sharing (for the Jehovah's Witnesses to claim they are, for they think they share more tracts). The Church, by Christ's definition, is a Group of people, devoid of their local churches, who have been saved by Christ with His Blood, living for Christ, spotless and have their names written in the Lamb's Book of Life.  

From the above description, it is clear that if a person is not truly saved, he can be a member of the Roman Catholic Church or any other local Church and still will not be part of Christ's Church/Bride and go to hell. In fact, if any local Church claims that no one can be saved except the person becomes a member of their church, such a church is a cult. It is not surprising that, not only Roman Catholics, but Latter-Day Saints, Jehovah's Witnesses and so many religious groups, think the same, i.e. anyone outside their religious denomination is lost. Thus, if you are not a member of their churches, you are lost. Well, they can tickle themselves with such falsehood; they will regret later, UNLESS THEY REPENT. Enough said about such cults, let's zero in on the Roman Catholic Church. 

While enduring the early persecutions of the Roman government (65-300 A.D.), most of professing Christianity went through a gradual departure from New Testament doctrine concerning church government, worship and practice. Local churches ceased to be autonomous by giving way to the control of "bishops" ruling over hierarchies. The simple form of worship from the heart was replaced with the rituals and splendor of paganism. Ministers became "priests," and pagans became "Christians" by simply being sprinkled with water (Instead of genuine repentance and baptism by immersion, which the Bible teaches). This tolerance of an unregenerate membership only made things worse. SPRINKLED PAGANISM is about the best definition for Roman Catholicism. This is what I call 'Christianizing paganism and Paganising Christianity' by the Romans.

The Roman Emperor Constantine established himself as the head of the church around 313 A.D., which made this new "Christianity" the official religion of the Roman Empire. The first actual Pope in Rome was probably Leo I (440-461 A.D.), although some claim that Gregory I was the first (590-604 A.D.). This ungodly system eventually ushered in the darkest period of history known to man, properly known as the "Dark Ages" (500-1500 A.D.). Through popes, bishops, and priests, Satan ruled Europe, and Biblical Christianity became illegal. Bear this in mind, throughout generations, even when sin reaches its highest peak, there are FEW PEOPLE who stands for God. They are often referred to as THE REMNANT. They don' conform to, and will not compromise with, the pattern of the world. Therefore, throughout all these, there remained individual groups of true Christians, such as the Waldensens and the Anabaptists who would not conform to the Roman system. 

So to sum up Message One, as we delve into the Dangers of Roman Catholicism, let's bear in mind that......

(i) Catholics LIE when they say the Church that Christ said He would build in Matthew 16:18 was their church (the Roman Catholic Church) and that Peter was their first Pope. It's a pure LIE. In any case, Peter married because he and Christ visited his mother-in-Law who was then suffering from fever (Matthew 8:14), and nowhere in the Bible are we told Peter divorced his wife.  

(ii) Catholics LIE when they say all of us who are outside (i.e. not a member of) the Roman Catholic, are lost. IT IS A PURE LIE. Anyone who is genuinely saved, having his name written in the Lamb's Book of Life and living daily for Christ till he dies or Christ comes, is part of Christ's Church/Bride. You need not be a member of the Roman Catholic Church before you can be saved. If Paul, Cornelius, the Ethiopian Eunuch and a host of people were saved when they were not even a member of any local Church, why should we believe Catholics that we need to be members of their Church in order to be saved? Think about it! Pray about it! Don' be deceived!

May God shed His Light on this Word and let His Spirit minister to you. 

All the Glory to God  

The Charismatic Falsehood Message 4: EXTORTION IN GOD'S HOUSE

Sunday, October 12, 2014....Topic One: The Charismatic Falsehood
Message 4: EXTORTION IN GOD'S HOUSE (''MEN OF GOD'' MAKING THEMSELVES RICH IN THE NAME OF RELIGION THROUGH SALES OF ANOINTING OIL, HANDKERCHIEFS, WATER FROM ISRAEL OR BORE-HOLES, STICKERS, ETC)
By: Brother Samuel Kwasi Forkuo

''And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.'' (Matthew 21:12-13)

One of the most wide-spread charismatic falsehood in our generation is ''Making Money in the name of Religion,'' which I often refer to as ''Extortion.'' More often than not, you see or hear preachers lambaste Policemen for extorting money from drivers on our highways. Meanwhile, these preachers are doing same (if not worse) thing in the house of God.

In fact, many Churches, temples and prayer camps have been turned into Wall Streets, World Trade Centres and in fact Markets. Clearly, from the afore-referred Text (Matthew 21), this phenomenon didn't start with our generation, at least it dated back to our Lord Jesus' time. When He saw religious leaders making money in the name of religion in the House of God in Jerusalem, He was furious, drove them away and referred to what God had already prophesied through Isaiah in Chapter 56:7.

In our days, the number is astronomical; so many so-called prophets have resorted to selling to the Congregants/Church Members things such as ANOINTING OIL, WATERS FROM THEIR BORE-HOLES OR FROM ISRAEL, HANDKERCHIEFS & STICKERS WHICH HAVE PICTURES OF THESE PROPHETS.

When questioned about the Biblical background to their selling of these items, these so-called prophets would often misquote to you Acts 19:12 (When Paul's handkerchief/Apron was laid on the sick to get healed), James 5:14 (Where Church Leaders are to anoint and pray for a sick brother). They Misquote these scriptures because, although God can heal through anointing oil, handkerchief or any other medium, NOWHERE (AND WATCH IT, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE) ARE WE TOLD TO SELL these things to people. Nowhere did Paul Sell Handkerchiefs to anybody. Brother James also DID NOT tell the Church Leaders to Sell the anointing Oil to the sick. YET SO MANY FALSE PROPHETS IN OUR DAYS ARE SELLING TO THE CHURCH MEMBERS HANDKERCHIEFS, ANOINTING OILS, WATERS FROM ISRAEL OR FROM THEIR PERSONAL BORE-HOLES IN THEIR HOUSES AND EVEN STICKERS WHICH BEAR THEIR IMAGES/PHOTOS.

If a Pastor, Prophet or Church Leader makes money genuinely, there is nothing wrong. But for them to make themselves rich through the sales of these paraphernalia (oil, handkerchief, stickers, Water from bole-holes or from Israel, etc) is equivalent to a police man collecting bribe from drivers on the Highway. Both cases are EXTORTIONS and the one done by ''Men of God'' in the ''House of God'' is WORSE THAN the one done by Policemen on our Highways.

A pastor/prophet will buy anointing which cost, say GHC5 (US$1.56) or GHC10 (US$3.12), but sell it to the Congregants at GHC200 (US$62.50) or GHC400 (US$125) just because the pastor/prophet has ''BLESSED'' or ''PRAYED OVER'' it. Thus, the anointing oil or water now costs more because of the special blessing the pastor/prophet has imparted on it. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A SCAM. Yet you see so many naive believers chase these items.

Note well: God's gift should never be sold. If you can heal or prophesy, know that it is GOD who is working through you. It is not by your power; it is a gift from God. He can take it back. DO NOT CHARGE PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE OF GOD. DO NOT CHARGE WHEN PEOPLE COME TO YOU FOR COUNSELLING OR ADVISE. DO NOT ASK FOR ''CONSULTATION'' FEE IN THE HOUSE OF GOD. DO NOT TURN THE HOUSE OF GOD INTO A DEN OF ROBBERS/THIEVES. HOW MANY PASTORS/PREACHERS/PROPHETS ARE RICH BY GENUINE MEANS/ HOW MANY OF THEM ARE RICH WITHOUT EXPLOITING THE POOR CONGREGANTS? HOW MANY OF THEM EXERCISE THE GIFT(S) OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHOUT CHARGING OR ASKING FOR MONETARY RETURNS? THE ANSWER IS ONLY FEW.

One thing I have seen is that, if you do the work of God genuinely, God will lead genuine people to give to you (your needs, not your wants) without you demanding from them. The little that God has blessed you with, is greater than the plenty that you have acquired through fraudulent means. If any of is a victim of ''Making Money in the name of RELIGION,'' let's bow down our heads in shame, confess, repent and return to God. He is ready to receive us.

May God grant us grace to remain faithful to Him, not moved by love for money. ''For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.'' (1 Timothy 6:10)...IN JESUS' NAME HAVE WE PRAYED, AMEN!

The Charismatic Falsehood Message 3: MIRACLE & HEALING

Wednesday, Sept 10, 2014....Topic One: The Charismatic Falsehood
Message 3: MIRACLE & HEALING
By: Brother Samuel Kwasi Forkuo

In fact, one of the grievous sins the Bible warns us of, is attributing the Work of the Holy Spirit to the devil. Therefore, we must be circumspect when talking about Miracle & Healing - which are also gifts given to the Body of Christ (The Church) for God's Glory (1 Corinthians 12:9&10). 

However, we must be careful not to fall victims to some foul spirits. Some miracles/healing are not from God. Whatever the Lord does/gives, the devil mimics/copies. So, just as God's (miracles/healing) are genuine/original, that of the devil are counterfeit/fake. For just as Moses' & Aaron's rod became a serpent, so did the rods of the enchanters and magicians of Egypt (Exodus 7:10-12).  Read carefully what Jesus Christ told the 70 followers he sent, when they came back to give nice report about the miracles and healings they performed.....  

''Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven.'' Luke 10:20 KJV

By extension, it is not enough to perform miracles or to heal the sick; we must make sure our names are written in the Book of Life. A person can perform powerful miracles and healings and still be lost. If you doubt, read carefully again what Christ said....

''Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.'' Matthew 7:22-23

When all these scriptures clearly tell us that the ''Ish'' is not in performing miracle or healing, many charismatic churches lay more emphasis on these gifts than living a Christ-like life. Many of the Tele-Evangelist  and those we hear them on the radio, are False healers. They use much trickery to dazzle their audience. In fact, in Kenya, 4 people left a hospital to be healed by a famous Tele-Evangelist (name-withheld) at one of his crusades, but they died as a result. 

Someone testified he heard on the 700 Club that a Pastor (name-withheld) claimed he raised a dead person but in an interview he stated he couldn't remember where or when - Where is the one he supposedly raised? Let us be honest, you raise someone from the dead and then you have amnesia as to the name of the person you raised. 

There are those who have claimed to be healed and in the last days God has allowed some people to be healed miraculously. Why?

And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: {12} That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (2 Th 2:11-12 KJV)

God is allowing people to be healed to allow those who want to be deceived to be deceived. In Matthew 12:39-40, we read:

''But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: {40} For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. (Mat 12:39-40 KJV) 

In Christ's 33 years, His generation sought for a sign and He called them evil. Biblical principles are constant and the same principle applies today, that when someone is looking for a sign, at the expense of salvation, such a person is evil. The Bible states we are to live by faith and not by sight....''For we walk by faith, not by sight. (2 Cor 5:7 KJV).

Our names could be written in Heaven (in the Lamb's Book of Life) even when we are amputees (or suffering any sickness/ailment). But we can never go to heaven when we're living in sin. We must repent. Salvation and obedience to Christ are more important than miracles and healing. 

I would be a hypocrite if I told you I were without sin. I stumble in my walk with God. But the joy is that He picks and put me back on track. The war between the flesh and the Spirit sometimes gets high. But we trust God for His daily power. Instead of seeking miracles and healing, let's work out our salvation with fear and trembling (Philippians 2:12).

May the Lord be our help....Amen!

ALL THE GLORY TO GOD

The Charismatic Falsehood (Message 2): TONGUES (Speaking In Tongues)

Fri/Sept5/14....Topic One: The Charismatic Falsehood
Message 2: TONGUES (Speaking In Tongues)

By: Brother Samuel Kwasi Forkuo

New Testament glossolalia or tongues is a supernatural manifestation of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 12).  In the book of Acts, on the day of Pentecost we read, “And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.  And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.  And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance” (Acts 2: 2-4).  Evidently, this panorama is wholly accredited to the mystical work of the Holy Spirit.  We cannot logically claim that these languages were known by the speakers because it specifically states that these believers were “filled with the Holy Ghost” and “the Spirit gave them utterance,” in which they all spoke in “other” or diverse languages.  These tongues or languages spoken were understood by the witnesses of this event.

The tongues addressed in Paul’s epistles to the Corinthian church differ in certain aspects from the information we have regarding the tongues of Pentecost. On Pentecost, the glossolalia, although unknown to the speakers, are heard and understood in the native tongues of the listeners; whereas, the tongues in 1 Corinthians are unknown languages to both the speakers and the hearers and must be interpreted.  The former is mentioned once in the Bible, but the latter is a continuing practice of the early church.  Secondly, the tongues in Acts were a sign to unbelieving Jews (Acts 2), but in Corinth, a sign to the unlearned believer or potential believers entering the church (1 Cor. 14).  In addition, tongues edify the church and are of personal benefit to the individual believer.

In sum, speaking in tongues was given to all the 120 believers in Acts 2 to be a sign to unbelievers, but  speaking tongues and/or its interpretation as in 1 Corithians 14, is one of the Spiritual Gifts God gives to the Church. Therefore, if a Christian doesn’t speak in Tongues, that does not mean he is not a child of God. In the Church, do we all prophesy? Do we all teach? Do we all heal? Do we all perform miracles?  If no, why should we all speak in tongues or interpret tongues? DON YOU KNOW THAT IF GOD HAS NOT GIVEN YOU THE GIFT OF TONGUE AND U WRONGFULLY DESIRE FOR IT, THE DEVIL CAN GIVE YOU A FAKE/COUNTERFEIT VERSION?

In Charismatic thinking the Baptism in the Holy Ghost is a separate event which means that when a person is baptized in the Holy Spirit, then they begin to speak in tongues giving evidence of the Holy Spirit’s presence in their life. The whole essence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is the washing away of our sins. Washing is the substance of the word baptism. A person who becomes a child of God has their sins washed away at the moment of salvation and is not a future event. The evidence that a person has the Spirit of God in their life is their spiritual walk in the FAITH HOPE & (especially) LOVE. ''And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;'' (Eph 5:18 KJV). One of the chief tenets of the tongues movement is that you must speak in tongues because it gives evidence of the Holy Spirit. Do you know a person can speak in tongues and still end up in Hell? The reason is simple: Apart from the fact that the version (of tongues) a person might be speaking could be a fake one, the tongue speaker’s failure to remain faithful till the end can send him/her to Hell – Despite the fact that the person spoke in tongues.

''There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. {2} For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. {3} For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: {4} That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. {5} For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. (Rom 8:1-5 KJV).

A person is filled with the Spirit upon their day of salvation. "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:" (Eph 1:3 KJV). As we see in this verse, we have been blessed with ALL spiritual blessings and God has withheld no part of our spiritual inheritance from us. We see in Eph 5:18 that we are to be filled with the spirit which is explained in Romans 8:1-5 where we are commanded to walk in the spirit and not in the flesh. Many charismatic movement preachers speak/minister to the flesh and emotions and therefore fall short of walking in the spirit. The Christian is to walk by faith and not by sight. When a person feels that they must speak in tongues to show evidence of the Holy Spirit in their life, then in essence they are walking by sight and flesh which is totally opposite what the Christian walk is.

In many charismatic churches today, you can see pastors forcing the congregants to speak in tongues – as if speaking in tongue is a ticket/visa to Heaven. I have seen cases whereby pastors went about slapping church members and ‘misbehaving’ during church service – all in the name of being ‘’led by the Holy Spirit.’’ And going about, spitting, slapping people, removing shoes, walking about anyhow, eye balls dancing? What kind of spirit are these people led by? Definitely not the Spirit of God. A careful study of the Word of God shows that the Holy Spirit is gentle and God will not give His children the Holy Spirit to misbehave.  ‘‘ For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.’’ 2 Timothy 1:7

Let’s be careful we don’t allow the enemy the chance to give us any fake/counterfeit version of the gift of speaking in Tongues. Compare the Tongues that you speak and the way you behave to that of the early church. If yours is not Biblical, please be humble enough to allow God to deliver you from that contamination. 

Conclusion:

Speaking in tongues is one of the gifts that the Holy Spirit gives to the members of His Body. If you have been blessed with that Gift, praise God for that and use it humbly. If you are not gifted with it, please operate in the area you have been gifted. Don’t go for a fake one. Bear in mind that, the enemy can give you fake one. Also, know that speaking in tongues doesn’t necessarily mean one is saved. And of course it doesn’t give a person a license to Heaven.  What is the essence of speaking in tongues to gain men’s glory whilst living in sin?  

May God grant us the Grace not to fall for the fake version of this beautiful gift (Tongues Speaking), bearing in mind that there abide three things; Faith, Hope and Love...And the GREATEST IS LOVE. Amen

ALL GLORY TO GOD